Could this be a sign of hope? Just when I was giving up on any
solution, see this
Ha'aretz article by Carlo Strenger ("Mahmoud Abbas' crucial message to Israel")
on an interview with Abbas that aired both in Israel and on Palestine TV. This is the heart of Strenger's piece:
.... Almost two years ago, Abbas said that the second intifada was the
greatest mistake the Palestinians ever made. This admission,
unfortunately, is all too true: the second intifada has made most
Israelis profoundly unwilling to take risks for peace. They wonder why
they should, once again, trust Palestinians who blew up hundreds of
Israelis when the peace process came to a standstill after the failed
Camp David summit.
In his interview ... a few days ago
on Israel’s Channel 2, Abbas took a second step of possibly even greater
importance. He explicitly said that the Arab world and the Palestinians
made a crucial error by rejecting the UN partition plan in 1947.
In doing so, Abbas is the first Palestinian leader to change a
sacrosanct element of the Palestinian narrative: self-representation as
pure victims. ...
While it would be both inhuman and stupid to deny the Palestinian
tragedy, the Palestinians’ refusing to take any responsibility for their
fate ... has contributed to the conflict’s
intractability. The rejection of the 1947 partition plan was one in a
series of catastrophic mistakes they made. The ... latest was the shelling of Southern Israel after the
withdrawal from Gaza in 2005....
Abbas’ admission that the Palestinian people’s fate could have been
dramatically different if they had made wiser decisions is crucially
important.... Instead of moving toward
compromise with Israel, too many Palestinians have waited for too many
years for a reversal of history. ...
[Moreover] Abbas personally made sure that the full-length forty minute interview was aired on Palestinian prime time TV “for educational purposes.” This is also a very significant step. Israelis have, for years, complained that Palestinians spoke very differently to their own constituency than to the outside world....
As to the refugee question, he [said] that it was clear to him that Israel could not integrate large numbers of Palestinians, and that he had endorsed the position of the Arab League Peace proposal that Israel could veto any Palestinian’s return to Israel.
....
Abbas has now made his position clear to Israel’s public. ... It is time for Israel’s public to ask whether it wants a government that refuses to engage with Israel’s best chance to end the Israel-Palestine conflict.
2 comments:
Just a few questions:
1) Has Mr. A. repudiated his own Soviet doctoral thesis of 1982, in which he claimed that Zionism, more or less, equals Nazism ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Abbas#Doctoral_dissertation_and_book
2) Has Mr. A. repudiated his vow to never recognize Israel as a Jewish homeland ?
3) Has Mr. A. taken back his praise and reverence for the "martyr" killers of Jewish civilians ?
4) Will Mr. A. allow Jews to live in the Palestinian state of the future ?
I realize that the "progressives" see Israel as the only hindrance to peace. But, with all that, they should try not to deny the reality of the Abbas leadership.
No "progressive" that I respect sees "Israel as the only hindrance to peace," which is why I constantly take issue with any who do. All you have to do, is make note of my posts here (beginning with "'Occupy Oakland, Not Palestine'," Nov. 9) and at the Tikkun blog to see that this is so.
I can't speak for the checkered past of Mahmoud Abbas, but the content of this post indicates that "Mr. A" has also made positive statements -- including this very recently. Mr. C is right to be skeptical, but wrong to be cynical. Like Ronald Reagan, I'd "trust but verify."
Post a Comment